Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Schedule, Outline

PHYS 424 Notes

Part 3

  1. Chapter 1 [continued]
    1. Statistical Interpretation of the Wave Function
      dP = y*y dx
      <x>=ò[xy*y dx]

      but ò -¥¥ [-i hbar(d/dx)y*y dx = 0 [see below], so we must have
      <p>= ò[y*(-i hbar)(d/dx)y dx]

    2. Schroedinger Equation

      To maintain consistency with classical physics, we must preserve the relation E = px2 / (2m) + V(x). The easiest way to preserve this relation is to relate the momentum and position operators in the same way. Hence we want

      [pop2 / (2m)]y + V(x)y = Eopy

      Substituting the relations for operators acting on y gives the classical relation multiplied by y, which is good.

      Substituting for the operators

      [- hbar2/(2m)] (d2/dx2)y + V(x)y = i hbar (d/dt)y               [2-1]

      This equation should be regarded as a guess, to be confirmed or contradicted by the success of its predictions. We will have to calculate some solutions to see if the equation is correct.

      Equation 2-1 is the Schroedinger Equation. It is the F=ma of Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics. It is frequently written more compactly by taking

      H = - [hbar2/(2m)](d2/dx2) + V(x)               [2-1']

      Hy = i hbar dy/dt

    3. Normalization

      We must have

      1 = ò -¥¥ [y*(x,t)y(x,t) dx]               [3-1]

      regardless of t, so that there will be a probability of one that there will be a particle somewhere at any time. Since y is a solution of a homogeneous differential equation, it will always have an overall arbitrary constant. This constant can be used at any one arbitrary time to satisfy eq. 3-1, provided that the integral in that equation is finite. Hence to have acceptable physics, we must have that y(x,t) goes to zero faster than x -1/2 at large |x| for any given t.

      If eq. 3-1 is satisfied at any given time, and if differentiating eq. 3-1 with respect to time gives zero, the normalization condition will hold forever. So we need

      0 = (d/dt) ò -¥¥ [y*(x,t)y(x,t) dx].

      But is it? From p. 12, we have

      (d/dt) ò -¥¥ [y*(x,t)y(x,t) dx]
          = ò -¥¥ [(dy/dt)*y +y*(dy/dt)] dx
      Since (d/dt)y = [i hbar/(2m)]d2y/dx2 -(i/ hbar) Vy, implying also that
      (d/dt)y* = [-i hbar/(2m)]d2y*/dx2 +(i/ hbar) Vy* [V is real], we have
      (d/dt) ò -¥¥ [y*(x,t)y(x,t) dx]
          = [i hbar/(2m)] ò -¥¥ [y* d2y/dx2 - (d2y*/dx2)y dx]
          = [i hbar/(2m)] ò -¥¥ (d/dx) [y* dy/dx - (dy*/dx)y dx]
          = [i hbar/(2m)] [y* dy/dx - (dy*/dx)y ] -¥¥

      Now we have already had to require that y goes to zero faster than x -1/2 for large x. Therefore [...] -¥ ¥=0, and

      (d/dt) ò -¥¥ [y*(x,t)y(x,t) dx]=0
      and the total probability of finding a particle is 1 at all times, as required for consistent physics.

      In summary, for one dimension the boundary condition y(x, t) falls faster than x -1/2 for large |x| and all t is necessary and sufficient to guarantee that the wave function may be properly normalized. [In three dimensions the situation is slightly more delicate. We will face this problem only when necessary.]

    Last revised 2005/02/11

    Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Schedule, Outline