University of Delaware
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Senior Seminar Group Project Members
Gina Bui, Adam Hock, Jake LaPorte, and Candy Tong
Are hybrid electric vehicles actually causing more environmental damage than internal-combustion vehicles?
Internal-combustion vehicles have not always been kings of the road as they are today. In 1895, one-third of all the automobiles registered in the state of Michigan were steam-powered, one-third battery-operated and one-third propelled by internal-combustion engines running on gasoline. Within 20 years, the steam and electrical cars had disappeared and the Model T petrol-powered car was making history. Battery-operated vehicles gave way to internal-combustion vehicles because a liter of gasoline provides at least 100 times the energy of a battery taking the same space. This extraordinary energy density overcomes the inherent disadvantage of the spark-ignition engine: 80% of the energy is wasted in combustion and only 20% gets to the wheels. Now, the battery-operated engines vehicles are making a comeback, with a new twist. The engines are not strictly battery-operated. They are a combination of battery and internal-combustion engines. They are called Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs). It is our intention to investigate whether or not HEVs actually cause more environmental damage than internal-combustion vehicles. We will present our findings in the following order: |
What is HEV? |
Advantage of HEVs |
Disadvantage of HEVs |
Available HEVs in the market |
* Honda's Insight |
* Toyota's Prius |
Future Technologies |
Conclusion |
References:
"A partly electric future: part-electric, part-gas-combustion automobile engines." The Economist 22 Jun. 1996: S8. |
Questions, comments or problems with this site e-mail The Webmaster at ny2058@hotmail.com
Last updated: Nov.8.2000