Abstract

paper -

 

  50                  Windows 2000 Lab System Upgrade: Good Idea, Bad Idea?

Jesse Ballard, University of Wyoming

Jim Osborn, University of Wyoming

 

Which is better:  Switching to the newest products available so that users have the best tools available or saying “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”; and sticking with what you have for a while?  Staying on the cutting edge of technology is an issue for any institution of higher learning.  After considering this and many other factors, including some of the new administrative features offered in Windows 2000, the University of Wyoming decided to upgrade its student lab system from NT 4.0 to Windows 2000.  This change should be completed by the end of August.

 

We will detail the planning and preparation that went into this project and the numerous issues we faced.  Some of the planning topics that we will discuss are:

 

        Hardware requirements and the need to upgrade machines

 

        Software testing and the need to find updated versions, or replace legacy programs

 

        Political ramifications of such a campus-wide upgrade

 

        Developing a workable time-line for the upgrade process

 

        Determining the man-power needed to implement the change

 

In addition to explaining the planning process of the upgrade, we will also discuss some of the problems and issues we encountered during the first stages of implementation.

 

Intended audience: anyone involved with developing, testing and implementing lab system upgrades

Keywords: Windows 2000, upgrade, lab system, operating systems

Abstract List