Abstract

paper -

 

104                  Creating a Technology Desk in an Information Commons

Susan Hales, Bucknell University

Don Rea, Bucknell University

Marcy Siegler, Bucknell University

 

Roughly three years ago, Bucknell University's Computer & Communication Services department (CCS) and the Library merged into a new department, called Information Services & Resources. One of the results of this collaboration was the decision to create an "Information Commons" on the first floor of the library - one place where people could go for assistance with all of their information needs, whether computing, media, or content-related.

 

The Information Commons was built around three service desks in the Library: Reference, Circulation, and a new Technology Desk. The Technology Desk is a combination of the CCS Help Desk (located in the computer center) and Media Services (located in a wing of the library building). These services were combined, expanded, and put in a prominent location on the first floor of the library with the other two service desks. The Technology Desk is now the front door to all technology services the organization provides, interfacing with seven or more different functional groups in the department.

 

Adjacent to the Technology Desk we created a Technology Courtyard, with 28 high-end multimedia stations with a large working space for each station. These stations are targeted for two audiences: those that need to do multimedia projects, and those who need space to work collaboratively. Multimedia and collaborative projects are receiving increasing emphasis from faculty in their assignments, and the Technology Courtyard is designed to facilitate this kind of work.

 

In our paper, we will address all aspects of the creation of the Technology Desk. This includes the philosophy behind the Technology Desk, the design of the physical layout, the services that the desk provides, the staffing issues, communication mechanisms, policies and procedures, and the use of student employees. We will also address what worked well in this process, and what we would do differently if we had the opportunity.

 

Abstract List