H = - [hbar2/(2m1)]
Ñ12
- [hbar2/(2m2)]
Ñ22
+ V(r1 - r2)
separates using r = r1 - r2 and
R = (m1r1
+ m2r2)
/ (m1 + m2)
since
d/r1i = dR/dr1id/dR + dr/dr1id/dr
= [m1 / (m1 + m2 )] d/dRi + d/dri |
d/r2i = dR/dr2id/dR + dr/dr2id/dr
= [m2 / (m1 + m2 )] d/dRi - d/dri |
H = - {hbar2 / [2 m1m2/(m1+m2)]} Ñr2 - {hbar2/[2(m1+m2)]} ÑR2 + V(r).
Setting
y(R, r)
= yR(R)
yr(r),
m = m1m2
/ (m1 + m2)
and M = m1 + m2
yields
- (1/yr){hbar2
/ [2 m)]}
Ñr2
yr + V(r)
- (1/yR){hbar2/[2M]}
ÑR2
yR = E
which implies the separated set of equations
However, since the particles are identical, we cannot tell the
difference between this situation and the one where particle 1 is in state
b and particle 2 is in state a:
yb(r1)
ya(r2)
Nature reflects this ambiguity by always having the wave fuction be the
symmetric combination of the two possibilities,
A[ya(r1)
yb(r2) +
yb(r1)
ya(r2)],
where A is a normalization constant. In principle, there could be a
minus sign between the two terms, but in practice only the plus sign
occurs. The use of the pluys sign for bosons can be proved in
relativistic field theory to be necessary in order for energies to be
bounded below.
while if particle 2 is in space state a and spin state a' while
particle 1 is in space state b and spin state b', the wave function
is
yb(r1)
cb'(s1)
ya(r2)
ca'(s1).
Again, we cannot tell which of these two possibilities we have, and the
wave function that actually occurs is
A[ya(r1)
ca(s1)
yb(r2)
cb(s2) -
yb(r1)
cb(s1)
ya(r2)
ca(s1)]
S=0, M=0: cu(1)cd(2) -cd(1)cu(2)
S=1, M=1:
cu(1)cu(2)
S=1, M=0:
cu(1)cd(2)
+cd(1)cu(2)
S=1, M=-1:
cd(1)cd(2)
The S=0 state is antisymmetric under interchange of the two particles. If the overall state is also to be antisymmetric, the space state must be symmetric. Hence the proper wave function is
A[ya(r1)yb(r2) +yb(r1)yb(ra)] [cu(1)cd(2) -cd(1)cu(2)]
Similarly, the S=1 state is an antisymmetric space state times one of the spin states. In particular, for S=1, M=0 the state is
A[ya(r1)yb(r2) -yb(r1)yb(ra)] [cu(1)cd(2) +cd(1)cu(2)].
If a=b, the antisymmetric space state vanishes and no spin-1 state is permitted [Pauli principle again]. Clearly the antisymmetrization requirement reduces the number of states two electrons can occupy.
2mEa2/p2 | n | m | Spin 0 state? | Spin 1 state? | Degeneracy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | 1 | yes | no | 1 |
5 | 2 | 1 | yes | yes | 4 |
8 | 2 | 2 | yes | no | 1 |
10 | 3 | 1 | yes | yes | 4 |
13 | 3 | 2 | yes | yes | 4 |
17 | 4 | 1 | yes | yes | 4 |
18 | 3 | 3 | yes | no | 1 |
Last Revised 05/09/05 |