| UDFS Phase II Issues Log -- Abbreviations: A/R-Billing Team = ARBT; Asset Management Team = AMT; Grants Team = GT; Facilities/Projects Team = FPT; Technical Team = TT; Communications Team = CT; Reporting Team = RT; Crestone Consultants = CC; Information Technology Steering Committee = ITSC; Executive Steering Committee = EST; Executive Committee = EC; Not Applicable = N/A | |||||||||||
| Team Name or other identifier: | GRANTS | ||||||||||
| # | DATE (Submitted) | MODULE (Abbreviate) | ISSUE (If abbreviations are used add definition above) | OWNER (Name(s) of who will resolve) | PRIORITY (High, Medium, Low) | COMMENTS (If abbreviations are used add definition above) | DATE (Issue Resolved) | ISSUE RESOLUTION (If abbreviations are used add definition above) | |||
| 1 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Data Input directly into FIPRD -versus- use of Webforms or ?? | H | 1. Phase I approach: Input into RPT to then update PRD | 00/00/00 | |||||
| 2 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Should we use Commitment Control? If so, what level of commitment control? | H | 1. More of a Departmental Issue 2. OVPR closeouts would be interested in being able to control charges beyond the end date. | ||||||
| 3 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Should F&A be calculated within Grants or outside of Grants? | M | 1. So that it is useful for Rates Negotiation? 2. Assets distribution? After big 11-03-03 Mtg. it was decided to try "both" ways- Grants will be setup for F&A to process, and Carol will figure a way for allocations to process. 3. If outside of Grants- Waived would also need to be calculated. | ||||||
| 4 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Does Grants care to make any recommendations about GA Distribution of F&A? | M | 1. Need to understand the process. | 11/04/05 | No- Departments/Colleges will be consulted by GL | ||||
| 5 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Will we need data feeds from HR? | M | 1. Need to detail issues 2. Need to schedule meeting with HR. | ||||||
| 6 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Does Grants need data from LAM? | M | 1. Issues related to possibly using for Effort Reporting | ||||||
| 7 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | What level of security to use on PRE? Are delivered options acceptable? | H | |||||||
| 8 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | What level of security to use on POST? Are delivered options acceptable? | H | |||||||
| 9 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | How will Awards be structured in PeopleSoft? 1 Award, 1 Project, many activities OR 1 Award, Multiple Projects OR ?? | H | 1. F&A can be calc. down the Activity ID 2. Activity ID does not have different PIs | ||||||
| 10 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | How to secure Salary information- anywhere it appears. | H | |||||||
| 11 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Who will monitor if ledger and Projresource Table are in sync? | H | |||||||
| 12 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Will we need the full Contracts functionality? | M | 1. Billing and Revenue Recognition issues will drive. | ||||||
| 13 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Will the Assets module adequately track all the necessary information related to C&G equipment? | M | 1. Will need input from Susan Tkachick | ||||||
| 14 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | What type of tree for Budget Checking- Spring or Winter? | M | 1. Spring- allows ranges.(as per Tamara) | ||||||
| 15 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Do we need a MOD to correct the rounding issues? | H | 1. Galveston customized. 2. You can go back into a category that does not get F&A charged and adjust to add up to whole dollar. 3. Mostly an issue in Pre- for printing on sponsor forms. | ||||||
| 16 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | LAM- S contracts need to have CLASS coded to be a more helpful tool for SAR reporting | H | |||||||
| 17 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Webforms in other modules will need to be changed to reflect the additional Grants/Project chartfields. | H | 1. Carl was informed of the possiblity 10/23/03 at wrapup meeting. | ||||||
| 18 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Do we need a Webform for budget revisions? | H | |||||||
| 19 | 10/17/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Will extra FTEs be needed in OVPR? | M | 1. Commitment Control might necessitate. | ||||||
| 20 | 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Determine which extra Project Chartfields to use | H | 1. will need to schedule a meeting with Facilities Folks | ||||||
| 21 | 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Need to develop a Migration Strategy | H | 1. FITST to FIPRD etc. | ||||||
| 22 | 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Who will maintain Trees? | M | |||||||
| 23 | 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Additional Activity IDs Process | H | 1. Delegation of authority folks would need a dynamic issuing of activity ids- who would then input them? | ||||||
| 24 | 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Who "owns" the Customer Table | H | 1. Billing Sponsors are in here too. | ||||||
| 25 | 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Locations issues | H | 1. Shared table, need meeting with Assets. | ||||||
| 26 | 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Who "owns" the Sponsor Table? | H | 1. Shared table | ||||||
| 27 | 11/05/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Will PRojType in Accounting Rules, be used to send F&A to Federal, State and Other? | H | 11/05/03 | Yes- FEDRL, STATE, OTHER, FDFLW | |||||
| 28 | 11/05/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Should we continue to filll in ProjectGrant on non-C&G Purposes?? | H | |||||||
| 29 | 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ GLOBAL | Subrecepients- necessary at Proposal Stage? | M | 1. Since only about 50% of all proposals get funded- could end up with bogus subrecepients in the Vendor table. | ||||||
| 31 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | How much historical data do the depts need us to bring over. | H | |||||||
| 32 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Do we convert all of the proposal data including budgets into PS | H | |||||||
| 33 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Naming Convention for Proposal Number: Auto number vs meaningful numbering | H | |||||||
| 34 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | PS proposal type vs GMS types. We have 3 1-1 matches, but have 4 have not direct match | M | |||||||
| 35 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | PS Proposal purpose. This field seem to be similar to our GMS function (ps program coa). Decision needs to be made on values to populate this field | ||||||||
| 36 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | PS Program Type: This field is to track particular funding opportunities. What type of funding opportunities do we set-up and track? (matches GMS program field) | ||||||||
| 37 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | KEYWORDS: Are we going to gather a list of general keywords to use during set-up? | M | |||||||
| 38 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Sponsor set-up: Need decisions on naming conventions for sponsor name, sponsor id, levels, type, etc. Do we need full addresses at time of set up | H | |||||||
| 39 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Sponsor levels How do we decided if it is "Primary" "Division" or "Program". Can we just label all sponsors as "Primary" | ||||||||
| 40 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Sponsors: Are grants billing sponsors set-up in grants or AR | ||||||||
| 41 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Professional Data: Are the we going to load this information at time of set-up. | H | |||||||
| 42 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Emplid and names: Need information from HR | H | |||||||
| 43 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | how do we decided who is an "eligible pi" for the set-up | H | |||||||
| 44 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Each PI must have phone & fax numbers along with dept association | H | |||||||
| 45 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Need deptid and dept location. Need HR to provide us with dept addresses | H | |||||||
| 46 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | BUDGET CATEGORIES and Budget Subcategories: GMS budgets are based on old UD obj codes, thus these object codes will have to be converted in PS budget categories based on the new PS account. Who makes the decision on which PS account relates to which budget category | H | |||||||
| 47 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Does Proj_Resource have to balance with GL? | H | 11/04/05 | Yes! Revenue and Expenses | |||||
| 48 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | CFDA number will need to be unhidden on award side | M | |||||||
| 49 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | The sponsor award number is a critical part of our tracking of an award. Where is the best place to report on this number | M | |||||||
| 50 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Project/Grant Chartfield. Are we going to have 1 award, 1 project with multi-analysis types. What is the best way to use this field to track an award with multi-PI with their on bucket of money. | ||||||||
| 51 | 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | FA TREE Who is going to set up this tree ( 9 different O/H methods) | ||||||||
| 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Do our current subrecipients need their location information and A-133 box checked in Grants | M | ||||||||
| 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | If we are taking our current awards and loading them as proposals and then move them to award, what is the best way to do that? | |||||||||
| 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | F&A set up. How is this going to be handled. | M | ||||||||
| 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Analysis Type has to be tagged on every transaction in order for FA to be charged. | H | GL- Resource Analysis Type | |||||||
| 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Milestones: How are we going to use this field? RS suggested she could use it for indicating qtrly FSR due. | |||||||||
| 10/27/03 | GRANTS/ DATA | Resources Analysis Type drives F&A. Is this the same a budget categories | H | 11/06/03 | NO | ||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Revenue recognition - we currently recognize revenue when the payment is received | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Deferred revenue - treatment of | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Grants bills separate from Misc bills | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Keep Grants AR separate from Misc AR | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | F&A Distribution - avoid double booking | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Billing history conversion - how much to bring across | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Who owns the customer table - Billing or Grants? | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Cash transmittal web form | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | AR Distribution codes - share with Grants | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Getting customers converted | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Delegated authority conversion | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Delegated authority billing | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Who will get PROD access for billing | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | UDTC - will they use billing? | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Gifts processing (4-5 accts) | |||||||||
| 10/28/03 | GRANTS/ Billing | Unbilled AR - accruals | |||||||||
| 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ Reporting | Delivered NIH 398 form does not work --needs resolution or build own report | GRANTS | H | Galveston is working on a word 2003 option; need to check with other schools; very few on pre-award | ||||||
| 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ Reporting | What tools will the report team use? | H | ||||||||
| GRANTS/ Reporting | Will RPT include Proj_Resources or will UOD tables add new fields? | H | |||||||||
| 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ Reporting | Data input directly into FIPRD for proposal submissions--the need is for immediate return of the data back to the submitter; web forms cause delay; RPT causes delay in data retrieval | evaluate our row level and security and page/screen options | ||||||||
| 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ Reporting | Who will train the Report team on the proper tools? | H | ||||||||
| 10/21/03 | GRANTS/ Reporting | Effort reporting | H | already reflected in other issues | |||||||