| UDFS Phase II Issues Log -- Abbreviations: A/R-Billing Team = ARBT; Asset Management Team = AMT; Grants Team = GT; Facilities/Projects Team = FPT; Technical Team = TT; Communications Team = CT; Reporting Team = RT; Crestone Consultants = CC; Information Technology Steering Committee = ITSC; Executive Steering Committee = EST; Executive Committee = EC; Not Applicable = N/A | |||||||||||
| Team Name or other identifier: | Asset Management | ||||||||||
| # | DATE (Submitted) | MODULE (Abbreviate) | ISSUE (If abbreviations are used add definition above) | OWNER (Name(s) of who will resolve) | PRIORITY (High, Medium, Low) | COMMENTS (If abbreviations are used add definition above) | DATE (Issue Resolved) | ISSUE RESOLUTION (If abbreviations are used add definition above) | |||
| 1 | w/e 11/26/03 | AMT | A/P Staff assigning profile IDs (comparable to item number in current PPR system) to equipment as it is expensed. | Change in business process | 00/00/00 | ||||||
| 2 | w/e 11/26/03 | AMT | Use of auto numbering for profile IDs. Karen Brown currently does not use item number to look up equipment; she uses item description. Item description field is in Psoft AM. | Advantage--will not have to manage a numbering system. Psoft has a "class" field which groups like-assets together. For ex, Automobiles is a class and the profiles grouped within would be van, police cruiser, etc. | |||||||
| 3 | w/e 11/26/03 | AMT | Consider use of Parent/Child functionality of the Psoft AM either at implementation or at a later time. | ||||||||
| 4 | w/e 11/26/03 | AMT | Need to review current business practice concerning add-on values (FASB rules concerning additional life expectancy or assign a new tag #). This is a frequent occurrence. | Would the Parent/Child functionality be useful in these instances? | |||||||
| 5 | w/e 11/26/03 | AMT | No field in Asset Acquisition Detail for ownership codes (ie, federal, state, university, etc.) from central table 20070. | Could be a bolt-on. | |||||||
| 6 | w/e 11/26/03 | AMT | No field in Asset Acquisition Detail for primary agency codes (source of funds in current PPR system from central table 03010). | Could be imported from 'source' chartfield in Psoft G/L if deemed that the value list is sufficient. | |||||||
| 7 | w/e 11/26/03 | AMT | The location code table will consist of every building/room combination. Auto numbering of location id is recommended. | Advantage--will not have to manage a numbering system. There is a building id field of 10 characters. It could contain the old building identifier of 2 alpha characters and then a numerical value. Joan Watson has exhausted available numbers as the current system has only 4 characters. Historical records could be maintained without having to reuse their numbers. | |||||||
| 8 | |||||||||||
| 9 | |||||||||||
| 10 | |||||||||||
| 11 | |||||||||||
| 12 | |||||||||||
| 13 | |||||||||||
| 14 | |||||||||||
| 15 | |||||||||||
| 16 | |||||||||||
| 17 | |||||||||||
| 18 | |||||||||||
| 19 | |||||||||||
| 20 | |||||||||||
| 21 | |||||||||||
| 22 | |||||||||||
| 23 | |||||||||||
| 24 | |||||||||||
| 25 | |||||||||||