Senators not in attendance were:
Susan Amert, Reed Geiger, James Hawk, Lawrence Nees, Raymond Nichols, John Pikulski
Senators excused were:
Edith Anderson, Alexander Doberenz, Bernard Herman, Frank Murray, Larry Peterson, Leslie Reidel, David P. Roselle, Christopher Smith, Jack Smith, Janet Smith, Carolyn Thoroughgood
Provost Pipes outlined the budget situation, noting that tuition is up 10%, the State appropriation is up 3%, gifts are up 27%, and sponsored programs up 20%. These increases, he stated, are commensurate with increases in expenditures. 1992-93 will see the continuation of budget constraints as the State has instructed an appropriation request of 98% of the 1991-92 budget, less 20% for increases in medical costs and 10% increase in energies. While Provost Pipes expects gifts and sponsored programs to continue to grow, he estimates that the University must now save $9.1 million from 1991-92 levels.
As part of the effort to reduce spending, the University will engage in fewer programs, Provost Pipes announced. Outlining the program reduction process currently underway, Provost Pipes reported that four programs are currently under scrutiny. Linguistics and Theatre are both continuing within the terms of their budgetary reductions. Interior Design and Medical Technology have been recommended to be phased out, but those recommendations have not yet bEen considered by Senate committees. He also stated that discussion of further program cuts continues.
Provost Pipes also pointed to the many on-going construction projects on campus and explained that the funding for these projects has come from sources limited specifically to those projects. Finally, Provost Pipes provide statistics on class size and tuition from 1987 to 1991, revealing a pattern of continued growth on both the undergraduate and graduate levels.
After some discussion and a question about the role of the Greek Life Task Force currently being formed, the following resolution was defeated by the Senate:
After discussion of the history of the proposed policies, the reasons for omitting other analogous reasons for extending the pre-tenure probationary period, the issue of equity, and questions of policy administration, the following resolutions were approved by the Senate:
A faculty member who becomes the parent of a newborn or newly-adopted child and who wishes time off for child care purposes, may choose to take a parental leave of absence. Parental leave may be granted for up to one year for each child, with a maximum of two years per faculty member. Parental leave is without pay. Time spent on parental leave shall not be counted in determining eligibility for sabbatical leave. This policy is intended to establish a faculty member's entitlement to a minimum standard, not to replace other informal or flexible arrangements that may be worked out between a faculty member and his or her Department chair. Request for parental leave, when possible, should be made one semester in advance by written request to the department chair or program director, Dean of the College and the Office of the Provost.
and be it further
An untenured faculty member who becomes the parent of a newborn or newly-adopted child may choose to take a one-year extension of the pre-tenure probationary period for each child, up to a maximum of two years. The extension shall be granted upon written request to the department chair or program director, with notification to the Dean of the College and the Office of the Provost. Faculty who choose this option must indicate in writing that they have done so in their dossier.
Respectfully submitted,
Judith Roof
Secretary
University Faculty Senate
