The New York Times The New York Times International January 31, 2003  

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
- Africa
- Americas
- Asia Pacific
- Europe
- Middle East
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
NYC Guide
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia/Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version

Get 25 commission-free trades from Ameritrade.


Go to Advanced Search/Archive Go to Advanced Search/Archive Symbol Lookup
Search Optionsdivide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, rbegleiter

Satellites Said to See Activity at North Korean Nuclear Site

By DAVID E. SANGER and ERIC SCHMITT

WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 ó American spy satellites over North Korea have detected what appear to be trucks moving the country's stockpile of 8,000 nuclear fuel rods out of storage, prompting fears within the Bush administration that North Korea is preparing to produce roughly a half dozen nuclear weapons, American officials said today.

Advertisement



Throughout January, intelligence analysts have seen extensive activity at the Yongbyon nuclear complex, with some trucks pulling up to the building housing the storage pond. While the satellites could not see exactly what was being put into the trucks, analysts concluded that it was likely that workers were transporting the rods to another site, either to get them out of sight, or to move them to a reprocessing plant to convert them into bomb-grade plutonium.

The Bush administration has said nothing publicly about the truck activity, deflecting questions about the subject. American intelligence analysts have informally concluded that the movement of the rods, combined with other activity that now appears to be under way at the Yongbyon complex, could allow North Korea to begin producing bomb-grade plutonium by the end of March.

"There's still a debate about exactly what we are seeing and how provocative it is," said one senior official. "The North Koreans made no real effort to hide this from us."

The satellite photographs of the truck activity have been tightly held by the administration, and not yet shared widely with allies. The administration's lack of public expressions of alarm contrasts sharply with its approach to Iraq, which the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, noted today was years behind North Korea in nuclear ability.

Some administration officials have said they want to avoid creating a crisis atmosphere with North Korea ó they believe its leader, Kim Jong Il, is hoping to set off a crisis to extract concessions from Washington ó while others say President Bush does not want to distract international attention from Iraq.

But a former nonproliferation official in the Clinton administration, Robert J. Einhorn, said tonight that by moving toward production of actual weapons, "the North Koreans may be taking a fateful step."

The spent fuel rods have been in secure storage since 1994, under a nuclear freeze agreement struck with the United States that year. But after American officials confronted Mr. Kim's government last October with evidence that it was violating the agreement by pursuing a new, clandestine nuclear program, North Korea renounced the 1994 agreement. It threw out international inspectors on New Year's Eve, and now appears to be moving the rods.

Despite the uncertainty, there is a growing consensus in the administration that North Korea is working to produce bombs as quickly as it can, perhaps hoping this will give it more negotiating leverage once Iraq is out of the spotlight.

The satellite evidence may present the Bush administration with an excruciating military choice. Pentagon officials say the North Korean program could be set back for years with a precision strike on the reprocessing plant. The plant is above ground and away from population centers. Such a strike is part of the Pentagon's contingency plan for an outbreak of hostilities on the Korean Peninsula. The Clinton administration developed plans for a strike against the complex in case diplomacy failed in the 1994 nuclear crisis.

But such a strike would be enormously risky. American officials and their allies fear that North Korea would retaliate against South Korea or Tokyo, an attack that could result in tremendous casualties.

Mr. Bush has pledged in recent weeks that "we have no intention of invading North Korea." But the word "invading" appears, to some Korea experts, to have been carefully chosen, so that Mr. Bush was not taking off the table the threat of a strike on the plant.

On the other hand, administration officials have said such a strike may not accomplish much, because North Korea has now admitted to a second nuclear program, involving enriched uranium. "We don't know where that program is," said one senior official. "So if you hit the plutonium plant, they would just speed up on the uranium program."

Continued
1 | 2 | Next>>




THREATS AND RESPONSES: ASIAN ARENA; The Two Koreas Open Cabinet-Level Talks  (January 22, 2003)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: OPPOSITION; Kennedy, in Sweeping Attack, Faults Bush on Iraq and Taxes  (January 22, 2003)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES; Russians Say Times Report Is Untrue  (January 22, 2003)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: WAR CLOUDS; Rumsfeld Says Iraq Diplomacy Is Nearing the End of Its Road  (January 21, 2003)  $

Find more results for North Korea and Atomic Weapons .



Doing research? Search the archive for more than 500,000 articles:




E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints
Single-Page View

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The New York Times newspaper.
Click Here for 50% off.


Home | Back to International | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Permissions | Privacy Policy
E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints
Single-Page View



Multimedia

Graphic:  Actions at Nuclear Facility



Recent Articles

North Koreans Still Demand Direct Talks With the U.S. (January 26, 2003)


Korea: Be Patient With North, Seoul's Kim Urges the U.S. (January 25, 2003)


Nuclear Standoff: Korean Talks Make Little Progress on Arms Issue (January 24, 2003)


Korean Peninsula: North Korea Informs South Korea That It Doesn't Plan to Produce Nuclear Weapons (January 23, 2003)



Topics

 Alerts
North Korea
Atomic Weapons
United States International Relations
Armament, Defense and Military Forces
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Take a Tour
Sign Up for Newsletters






V-E Day

Price: $25. Learn More.







You can now access the International Herald Tribune online? Visit IHT.com to read the world's daily newspaper and catch up on opinions from around the globe, news about the expatriate lifestyle, international travel and dining and more.