United Nations and United States Policies Regarding
Chemical and Biological Weapons
 
 
   12
            The United Nations has long been strictly opposed to the use or possession of Chemical and Biological Weapons as they pertain to modern warfare.  Through the induction of three separate and important doctrines, the United Nations Security Council has provided guidelines for the controversial topic of chemical and biological warfare.  These guidelines included definitions of the weapons themselves and policies regarding their use and the destruction of current arsenals.

 
Geneva Protocol
            During World War I, the use of poison gas resulted in over one million military casualties and over 100,000 civilian casualties.  In 1925, riding the momentum of the Versailles treaty, which put an end to WWI, a convention was held in Geneva, Switzerland to discuss the use of chemical and biological weapons.  Representatives from the governments of France, Poland and the United States drew up a proposal that stated, among other things, that "the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices, has been justly condemned by the general opinion of the civilized world."  This protocol, which eventually became the Geneva Protocol was signed on June 17, 1925.  However, many countries did not agree with the protocol due to provisions about riot control agents and did not ratify it until amendments were made (i.e  United States, 1975 ).  For a complete list of the state parties and their ratification dates, click here.
 

Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention

            Those amendments did not occur until nearly fifty years, two failed attempts and another World War later.  World War II and the advent of the cold war saw the development and stockpiling of many new types of chemical and biological weapons.  The threat of their use was very eminent.  In 1972, the govervments of the United States and the Soviet Union provided separate but identical proposals to the United Nations.  These proposals, known as the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), prohibited " biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no jurisdiction for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes."  It also condemned the use of any equipment meant for the delivery of such agents for war.  Another important article of the BTWC was the one requiring states to destroy all such materials within nine months of the signing of the convention.  This was signed by many countries in London, Moscow and Washington D.C on April 10, 1972 and ratified by the United States on December 26, 1975.  For a complete list of signatories, click here.

 
Chemical Weapons Conventions

            But the most recent and perhaps most important doctrine yet set forth by the United Nations is the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).  After the years of heavy controversy surrounding the Gulf War with Sadaam Hussein’s ever present chemical and biological weapon arsenal, a new and improved doctrine was needed.  The CWC was opened for signing on January 13, 1993 in Paris, France.  With over 140 pages, 24 articles, 3 annexes and a preamble, it represents one of the most complex international doctrines ever signed.  The convention reaffirms the rules set forth in Geneva as well as the BTWC and also creates regulations regarding new advances in chemical weaponry and the destruction of them.  However, as with the other two conventions, the CWC was not immediately ratified by the United States.  After four long years of battles between  President Clinton and Congress, the United States finally ratified the CWC on April 25, 1997, four days before the convention officially went into effect.
 
 

             At the present time, 116 countries have ratified the CWC. This is a global map of the states that have ratified the CWC as of October 5, 1998.  The states that have ratified are in green.  Those states that have signed but not ratified are in yellow.  And those who have not signed or ratified are in red.
 

 

 The United States’ stand on chemical and biological weapons is similar to that of the United Nations General Assembly.  After being criticized heavily for its use of Agent Orange in Vietnam, the US, under President Reagan, set forth laws requiring the destruction of its chemical weapons arsenal.  The United States does not stand for the use of chemical and biological weapons and is in staunch opposition of any country who uses them.
 
 
 

Previous Page    Next Page
 
 
Home