10:45 a.m., Dec. 10, 2002--An historian with a deep-seated passion for his area of research and a long-time enthusiasm for teaching, Peter R. Kolchin, Henry Clay Reed Professor of History, has been named the 2002 winner of the Francis Alison Award, the Universitys highest faculty honor.
The award, which includes $6,000 and a medal, was established by the University's Board of Trustees in 1978 to recognize the scholarship, professional achievements and dedication of the UD faculty.
 |
Peter R. Kolchin, Henry Clay Reed Professor of History: Once you study a period of history, as I did with emancipation, you develop a curiosity about how it all came to be. |
President David P. Roselle announced the award Nov. 14 at the annual Named Professors Dinner. As is custom, previous Alison Award winnersall members of the Francis Alison Societythen hosted a luncheon for Kolchin. This spring he will help establish a new tradition as he becomes the first recipient to deliver what will be known as the annual Alison Lecture.
In announcing the award President Roselle said, Peter Kolchin is an accomplished historian and the author of numerous books and articles on American slavery, the Civil War and emancipation. He is the winner of Columbia University's Bancroft Prize, the Organization of American Historians' Avery Craven Award and the Southern Historical Association's Charles Sydnor Award. He is a 2002-03 Distinguished Lecturer of the Organization of American Historians. We hold Peter and his scholarship in the highest regard.
Provost Dan Rich also praised Kolchin saying, "Dr. Kolchin continues the legacy of scholarship and mentorship begun by Dr. Alison, as he is recognized as one of the nation's leading historians and an esteemed scholar in the history of slavery. Peter Kolchin is equally adept at translating his scholarly insights into lessons in his classroom, where he demonstrates exceptional skills as a teacher."
Inspired by undergraduate and graduate professors and the climate of the 1960s, Kolchin said he became fascinated with Southern history during his days as a student at Columbia and Johns Hopkins universities.
Always the scholar, he is, of course, careful to point out that something is only Southern if it is compared to things not Southern.
In explaining his early interest he said, In some ways, the civil rights movement of the 1960s was a second period of reconstruction for the South. It was a very exciting period that held the possibility for major change. Setting up a more integrated society held all sorts of possibilities, all kinds of drama.
At the same time Kolchin was marching on Washington and hearing Dr. Martin Luther Kings I Have a Dream speech, he was being influenced by professors who studied the original reconstruction period after the Civil War. Kolchins first book, First Freedom: The Responses of Alabamas Blacks to Emancipation and Reconstruction, an expansion of his thesis, was about that period. He then moved backwards into what would become a large portion of his lifes workAmerican slavery.
Once you study a period of history, as I did with emancipation, you develop a curiosity about how it all came to be, he explained.
In his second book, Unfree Labor: American Slavery and Russian Serfdom, Kolchin began weaving the second strong thread of his researchthe comparative side. The book, published in 1987 by Harvard University Press, won the Charles S. Sydnor Award of the Southern Historical Association, the Bancroft Prize in American History given by Columbia University and the Avery O. Craven Award of the Organization of American Historians.
James M. Brophy, associate professor in UDs Department of History, who nominated Kolchin for the Alison Award, said the book offered the historical profession a new breadth of vision and that Kolchins efforts amounted to a paradigm shift in thinking about slavery [setting] new standards for researching and writing comparative history.
Brophys letter also quotes David Brion Davis, one of the countrys foremost scholars on slavery who has written that the book places Kolchin clearly among the two or three leading experts on the history of American slavery.
In the book, Kolchin compares and contrasts the two systems of bondage. Russian serfdom was like slavery but different, he said. Each evolved in different environments. The American system was race-based, but ethnicity made little difference in the Russian system. Both evolved in a similar time frame and both were ended about the same time. He points out that in the Southern U.S. abolition came violently, through civil war. In Russia it came peacefully by proclamation of the czar.
Kolchin is now working on a sequel, a companion volume that will focus on emancipation and its aftermath.
I am interested in comparing these two emancipations going on at the same time. What happened to people who were owned? What replaced bondage?
In both countries emancipation began with enormous excitement and hope, with a feeling of reform and in just a few years, both experienced a profound sense of disillusionment. In the U.S., Jim Crow laws were enacted, and in Russia, the government became preoccupied with the peasant question, which had supposedly been resolved forever by emancipation. There was an increasing despair in the lives of former slaves and serfs and former masters were unhappy, angry and humiliated. Like many other post-emancipation societies, Russia and the United States were gripped by a pervasive sense of things gone wrong.
Kolchin published his third book, American Slavery: 1619-1877, in 1993 and has completed a revised version that is due out next year.
A review in The New Yorker of the original work called it a miraculous achievement, adding, No history book published this year is more important to understanding Americas past and present than this concise, well-written and sensibly argued survey of Americas greatest shame.
The books intent, he said, is to show the whole sweep of American slavery, to synthesize an enormous amount of historical researchmostly specializedand bring it all together and tell it in a short, interpretive survey. The book, he added, was designed to reach both those who knew little about slavery and those who knew a great deal but needed to see the overall picture.
Most research, he explained, is narrowly focused and does not take into account how American slavery evolved and changed.
For example, he said, in the late pre-Civil War period, the time most written about, Christianity played a major role in the lives of American slaves. That was not the case in the 17th century before slaves were converted.
Similarly, Kolchin explained, by the 19th century, the majority of slaves were born in the U.S. In Colonial times, many slaves were born in Africa and brought their culture with them. There is a great deal of difference between being born into slavery as a fourth-generation American and being imported to America from Africa as a first-generation slave.
The revised edition of American Slavery will incorporate the vast amount of research conducted in the last decade, Kolchin said.
There has been an extraordinary boom in research on American slavery. The field has been very much in flux. It is very exciting. The centrality of slavery to the history of the United States raises all sorts of fundamental questions about the nature of American society and American values.
Also due out next year is Kolchins latest work, a book called A Sphinx on the American Land: The 19th-Century South in Comparative Perspective. The collection of analytical essays is based on the Walter Lynwood Fleming Lectures he gave at Louisiana State University two years ago.
The book has already been called an elegant, profound volume [that] proves Kolchin to be one of the stellar Southern historians of his generation.
In it he compares the South with the un-South (the North) and then explores the many Souths, reminding readers that there never has been one archetypal South or Southerner. He also compares the South with other Southsthat is regions outside the United States that share some of the same characteristics as the American South.
The book, being published by Louisiana State University Press, is due out in early 2003.
Meantime, graduate students advised by Kolchin also are turning out their own works. Annette Woolard, for example, will have her revised thesis published under the title, Integrating Delaware: The Reddings of Delaware by the University of Delaware Press next year. Other Kolchin advisees include historians at the Louisiana State Museum and in the history department at Murray State University in Kentucky.
As Brophy states in his letter, The extensive publication record and the prestigious external professional activities of Professor Kolchin might suggest reclusive behavior with teaching and service, but this is clearly not the case. He is a dynamo in the departments graduate program, offering core seminars and directing scores of successful dissertations
.He has regularly run a workshop for Ph.D. students getting ready to go on the job market
lunches with graduate students every Thursday and regularly holds an advanced seminar of dissertation students to discuss one anothers work as well as matters of professional interest.
A member of the UD faculty since 1985, Kolchin previously taught at the University of New Mexico (1976-85), the University of Wisconsin at Madison (1969-75) and the University of California at Davis (1968-69). During the spring of 1985, he was a visiting professor of history at Harvard University.
His teaching interests include 19th-century U.S. history; the South, slavery, the Civil War and Reconstruction; and the comparative history of slavery, forced labor and emancipation.
He is the author of many articles and review essays in professional journals and is often invited to lecture on his research, most recently at the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge, where he was a Visiting Mellon Scholar in 2002, and the universities of Pennsylvania, Cincinnati and Texas. He also has participated in numerous professional conventions and conferences.
Among his many honors are fellowships from the UD Center for Advanced Study, the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History at Harvard University and the Institute for Southern History at Johns Hopkins University.
Kolchin received his bachelors degree in history from Columbia in 1964 and his doctorate in history from Johns Hopkins in 1970.
Article by Beth Thomas
Photos by Greg Drew
|