From MAILER-DAEMON@AOL.com Fri May 22 13:15:59 2015 Return-Path: Received: from mx14.bounceio.net (mx14.bounceio.net [192.237.151.14]) by partner-mae01.mx.aol.com (Partner Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 19EF938000081 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mx14.bounceio.net id hbti4u0rhk4l for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 17:15:58 +0000 (envelope-from ) Authentication-Results: Inbound-MTA; ; Received: from imb-m6.mx.aol.com (imb-m6.mx.aol.com [64.12.109.84]) by Inbound-MTA (Haraka/2.5.0) with ESMTPS id B3530F0C-6F70-4290-9BA1-DD4BD4B7A982.1 envelope-from <> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 May 2015 17:15:58 +0000 Received: from omr-m01.mx.aol.com (omr-m01.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imb-m6.mx.aol.com (AOL Mail Bouncer) with ESMTPS id 5E15838001977 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by omr-m01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) id 3F4777054A30A; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: jfweiher@aol.com Auto-Submitted: auto-replied MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com" Message-Id: <354652633.18594958.1432314958518.JavaMail.tomcat@omta.bounceio.net> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1432314958; bh=jO68E1fkdTJYqPLi89zxRZxcGHCmlhMq02+hG6hr/b4=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z0iJ87g5v+poVG0XP1M5wn8zwINiNWJ0kycuhWxXh7/El/SWzoHaffiQ1F+i/g8Bd 3RPbc6AaGjfSJdJPvTg68kooGeI8spg1cv5o0mPhMHToRqmCpaq/yw9299og4YOizw ncmf8unIcQhQdNJrivgu598i5gAymB4YEyBzpTmQ= X-BounceIO-Id: B3530F0C-6F70-4290-9BA1-DD4BD4B7A982.1 Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 17:15:59 +0000 X-AOL-VSS-INFO: 5700.7163/104077 X-AOL-VSS-CODE: clean DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1432314959; bh=jO68E1fkdTJYqPLi89zxRZxcGHCmlhMq02+hG6hr/b4=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GBgkm08xcO9esSP2CdwBR/Xm2wJCLLW7tQtgNTTZAWwfTbq1WIjYbjZqNfWa9D737 q3VoAddN8g48uiNkadnhslj57HtUXLGS/CiOfdMQjewzRyPtUlcfStFOTPcJa+XlmU 9/cxQ/ndwufnFZPHEgOyKq5yLIIWaG6pnYcnNsf4= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afe94555f644f0a63 X-AOL-IP: 192.237.151.14 X-AOL-SCOLL-EIL: 1 This is a MIME-encapsulated message. --A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com Content-Description: Notification Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: "----- The delivery status notification errors -----". The line beginning with "Diagnostic-Code:" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The following lines contains the RFC822 header of the original email message. Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator. --AOL Postmaster ----- The delivery status notification errors ----- : host mx2.demon.co.uk[91.221.169.150] said: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMAE_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is (in reply to end of DATA command) --A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com Content-Description: Delivery report Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; omr-m01.mx.aol.com X-Outbound-Mail-Relay-Queue-ID: A26CC700000B6 X-Outbound-Mail-Relay-Sender: rfc822; jfweiher@aol.com Arrival-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Final-Recipient: rfc822; RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Original-Recipient: rfc822;RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; mx2.demon.co.uk Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMAE_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is --A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com Content-Description: Undelivered Message Headers Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers Return-Path: Received: from mtaomg-mbc02.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mbc02.mx.aol.com [172.26.221.144]) by omr-m01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id A26CC700000B6 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-ana02c.mail.aol.com (core-ana02.mail.aol.com [172.27.9.12]) by mtaomg-mbc02.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 6BB403800008A for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 173.62.214.77 by webprd-m70.mail.aol.com (10.74.71.88) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 From: jfweiher@aol.com To: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Message-Id: <14d7c9f54da-59cd-4051c@webprd-m70.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: APLX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_347989_1241167079.1432314926296" X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS TABLET X-Originating-IP: [173.62.214.77] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1432314926; bh=bfzWUYeO5ho3znC2i6gmKFckr1MvM2yVrmhD7A2Unv4=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lUr1caN9lr4dAG5BhRwHmZJpbRV8Vc2s8B3mNP7lM6eoMPiTff2BLJef37lmW1nhd Lx6na7ztdK096FEwC+bsjdq7M0wrleLlYpsCW6mfAELiPcicCW6Mw1XNOxwR9U9Bt+ JP6j74KxoSck6YBhhBrYMIwBQdkPf2R/uLddD8LQ= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1add90555f642e5eff --A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com-- From MAILER-DAEMON@AOL.com Fri May 22 13:15:59 2015 Return-Path: Received: from mx14.bounceio.net (mx14.bounceio.net [192.237.151.14]) by partner-mae01.mx.aol.com (Partner Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 19EF938000081 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mx14.bounceio.net id hbti4u0rhk4l for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 17:15:58 +0000 (envelope-from ) Authentication-Results: Inbound-MTA; ; Received: from imb-m6.mx.aol.com (imb-m6.mx.aol.com [64.12.109.84]) by Inbound-MTA (Haraka/2.5.0) with ESMTPS id B3530F0C-6F70-4290-9BA1-DD4BD4B7A982.1 envelope-from <> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 May 2015 17:15:58 +0000 Received: from omr-m01.mx.aol.com (omr-m01.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imb-m6.mx.aol.com (AOL Mail Bouncer) with ESMTPS id 5E15838001977 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by omr-m01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) id 3F4777054A30A; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: jfweiher@aol.com Auto-Submitted: auto-replied MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com" Message-Id: <354652633.18594958.1432314958518.JavaMail.tomcat@omta.bounceio.net> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1432314958; bh=jO68E1fkdTJYqPLi89zxRZxcGHCmlhMq02+hG6hr/b4=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z0iJ87g5v+poVG0XP1M5wn8zwINiNWJ0kycuhWxXh7/El/SWzoHaffiQ1F+i/g8Bd 3RPbc6AaGjfSJdJPvTg68kooGeI8spg1cv5o0mPhMHToRqmCpaq/yw9299og4YOizw ncmf8unIcQhQdNJrivgu598i5gAymB4YEyBzpTmQ= X-BounceIO-Id: B3530F0C-6F70-4290-9BA1-DD4BD4B7A982.1 Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 17:15:59 +0000 X-AOL-VSS-INFO: 5700.7163/104077 X-AOL-VSS-CODE: clean DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1432314959; bh=jO68E1fkdTJYqPLi89zxRZxcGHCmlhMq02+hG6hr/b4=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GBgkm08xcO9esSP2CdwBR/Xm2wJCLLW7tQtgNTTZAWwfTbq1WIjYbjZqNfWa9D737 q3VoAddN8g48uiNkadnhslj57HtUXLGS/CiOfdMQjewzRyPtUlcfStFOTPcJa+XlmU 9/cxQ/ndwufnFZPHEgOyKq5yLIIWaG6pnYcnNsf4= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afe94555f644f0a63 X-AOL-IP: 192.237.151.14 X-AOL-SCOLL-EIL: 1 This is a MIME-encapsulated message. --A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com Content-Description: Notification Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: "----- The delivery status notification errors -----". The line beginning with "Diagnostic-Code:" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The following lines contains the RFC822 header of the original email message. Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator. --AOL Postmaster ----- The delivery status notification errors ----- : host mx2.demon.co.uk[91.221.169.150] said: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMAE_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is (in reply to end of DATA command) --A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com Content-Description: Delivery report Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; omr-m01.mx.aol.com X-Outbound-Mail-Relay-Queue-ID: A26CC700000B6 X-Outbound-Mail-Relay-Sender: rfc822; jfweiher@aol.com Arrival-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Final-Recipient: rfc822; RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Original-Recipient: rfc822;RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; mx2.demon.co.uk Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMAE_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is --A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com Content-Description: Undelivered Message Headers Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers Return-Path: Received: from mtaomg-mbc02.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mbc02.mx.aol.com [172.26.221.144]) by omr-m01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id A26CC700000B6 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-ana02c.mail.aol.com (core-ana02.mail.aol.com [172.27.9.12]) by mtaomg-mbc02.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 6BB403800008A for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 173.62.214.77 by webprd-m70.mail.aol.com (10.74.71.88) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:15:26 -0400 From: jfweiher@aol.com To: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Message-Id: <14d7c9f54da-59cd-4051c@webprd-m70.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: APLX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_347989_1241167079.1432314926296" X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS TABLET X-Originating-IP: [173.62.214.77] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1432314926; bh=bfzWUYeO5ho3znC2i6gmKFckr1MvM2yVrmhD7A2Unv4=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lUr1caN9lr4dAG5BhRwHmZJpbRV8Vc2s8B3mNP7lM6eoMPiTff2BLJef37lmW1nhd Lx6na7ztdK096FEwC+bsjdq7M0wrleLlYpsCW6mfAELiPcicCW6Mw1XNOxwR9U9Bt+ JP6j74KxoSck6YBhhBrYMIwBQdkPf2R/uLddD8LQ= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1add90555f642e5eff --A26CC700000B6.1432314958/omr-m01.mx.aol.com-- From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Thu May 21 16:24:55 2015 Delivered-To: weiher99@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.215.3 with SMTP id o3csp822973oig; Thu, 21 May 2015 13:24:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.229.103 with SMTP id sp7mr4024392vdc.60.1432239895194; Thu, 21 May 2015 13:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-vn0-x245.google.com (mail-vn0-x245.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8si400724vda.25.2015.05.21.13.24.55 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 May 2015 13:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-vn0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::245 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::245; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-vn0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::245 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by mail-vn0-x245.google.com with SMTP id f190so11293082vnb.2 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 13:24:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=p7SBDwbAxEPfP4zUdiObawXWr4ULt68ThIzPmP7j5ww=; b=QA628p002zj5K+V6c9vbl3VsLsf75q7xNn/pE7K93V8AStuyCz/GqOGtamSVGMRWtw nQCvAnvGQIYranrXV8UyLVXmWLf97vxd0EV1kTqh8zlglIpRjuVR0EJOIooIH6X/cQ7V PnUr4zm9lwj+OXG/fbA6NLeIiWQcTuYVH8xPmYEu6sHVIXgnZGJkfR7QwKvBpeOAxfrJ Mjmq/ob6bCHngJONw0NgQykqFUekll5YgCDnUH2qiYt3WoYRm0Ad9yB4b+ch3FP31I5Y t8Be4MuC6q+M88aszhOMGi5ukbFF7+ZvfbH4/C2Q3edQFs9vmMkV2mbWgcg59Wplogy+ +gJA== X-Received: by 10.140.128.16 with SMTP id 16mr6676291qha.75.1432239895012; Thu, 21 May 2015 13:24:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.140.128.16 with SMTP id 16mr5606979qha.75; Thu, 21 May 2015 13:24:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher99@gmail.com X-Failed-Recipients: microapl@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a1134f3042ce48805169d56c5@google.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 20:24:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: microapl@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx2.demon.co.uk. [91.221.169.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3Dgmail.com; s=3D20120113; h=3Dfrom:content-type:date:subject:to:message-id:mime-version; bh=3DRyOF557gBsCk0draEeYMD+Q1XEtB+KLPYyjTV6ajA/I=3D; b=3DXUFe0wv018UpJvyB9t2MKagHdVP3Wth7gvWhFyRFIzTn5xmXVkCus+YnICJWMKU= a4l Z+YPc84w8dCJgdTh71R13pfw3Nz6u5RIQulsslt4crngcVlH854oyJNrVZd68dxab8= 1G bvr3KLoqxfW9F1p4QI+kdVRTSZOTxhRD+ORZS3QWZqNClFI+mKekEsSeDXc75ve4N0= +F SSJ9I7lFZESHdvivtY3K64rdG85c9xov8m/jUD7O84cPj8n+N2n1o0S3P8sD/0iozH= c3 h/Kb5rqzv7iRwQrUcRCVuYn+P5vMIjKrJpDIDs70MrzjIHtyyZ3LCbjZBfzJ9xAVdb= LF TavA=3D=3D X-Received: by 10.140.128.16 with SMTP id 16mr6673138qha.75.1432239863541; Thu, 21 May 2015 13:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 17sm14017343qky.29.2015.05.21.13.2= 4.22 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Thu, 21 May 2015 13:24:22 -0700 (PDT) From: weiher99 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=3DApple-Mail-72-813612094 Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:24:21 -0400 Subject: APLX To: microapl@microapl.co.uk Message-Id: <338B1ACE-C3C7-46CB-8D7C-CA9D92716802@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Several days I tried to respond to your email many times over most of one n= ight but every email no matter how I changed the content was always rejecte= d by your input system. This time I will try on another day with all previ= ous correspondence cut out, my response attached as a file, only microapl@m= icroapl.co.uk as the recipient, sent from another email account and the sub= ject line changed. Jim From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 23:08:40 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1149780wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:08:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.35.230 with SMTP id n93mr39543326qgn.7.1432091319529; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-qg0-x246.google.com (mail-qg0-x246.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m70si2995151qhb.89.2015.05.19.20.08.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 20:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qg0-x246.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::246 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::246; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qg0-x246.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::246 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by qgde91 with SMTP id e91so16966200qgd.2 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:08:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fqpF81yoPwl2DBJWSvbBO+KpsvYvD0k8HStLTgiWUOo=; b=SZ/sagEOaexr4vlrZDPzjKVQHThCJocW8M50dNyu3AD2EmiVh0UzHKWzP2BYO7fdAF 4eyNFFxd3VYjGM8tgi9ndNMTCLiACbW/PZ2WUdykJeopGc8LHI8m1soALgC+u4Zm3XmA R3Gd7aP/EXCkT2k8yZx9d7h8p5dcXbp0jOExfpQ7RyC3RfpU5RyO8tZ8WtWHQd1Apj/h PqmX8mYAA8qVr4pNZ/lgl6F62uzwvY33zgUm88VEFafwiSh+PGh0Ak8lPoCBPu55bOb6 itl+XW2XoO/jkLL/GU74tp/CH46DIJvOTW9ojTg4jxLeIpdwakABu+wyEMtctvciyLhJ 4xUA== X-Received: by 10.140.104.129 with SMTP id a1mr40417363qgf.89.1432091319141; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:08:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.140.104.129 with SMTP id a1mr33167433qgf.89; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:08:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a11354dae5d03fd05167abee1@google.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 03:08:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx1.demon.co.uk. [91.221.168.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:= date :subject:to:message-id:mime-version; bh=3D4gMAwRQ8h0hIArNDcKtLC8j4fBrlwZcYFolMMks/yWU=3D; b=3DCDgNIiJoEuS3fU6E4b/f0yN2cyr4Q1l0wahVMX2sfeCdaBV+fd1G8ZziYCediOq= Iej R4F0a1nkmALNmVC43VlhtjeqZeMYaDyH/xGMtGuiTRSXW6BRA4PqwBB1UEWRk4GvZW= ie dGUq0WYiRg+3nXezT0tE+WDyMA3FSoTznt1Ym2KVmnZL0Ft/cIStODEgsDWd01IwNU= RZ hfnIbbXHDf4HjIViP0oYyGFHuxtSGjtrY7WVdlsm3kMe4lFiPxQqq14XBFz5Qqjy63= L7 K+eLHfu2iYTrZVPr+++CLKhX14Hy4wTyG/a7wVnq3bBMh30mFsFunMI221UqfCkJLK= Ho YaUw=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYO+jZ3Z04F51jbFUWoaJqm5BuEVtP9CWTWDt0DU3x5Xvdm90= pzV1guBbYEMMlG+jzDWYJ X-Received: by 10.140.104.129 with SMTP id a1mr40415215qgf.89.1432091287317= ; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 68sm10396860qgk.9.2015.05.19.20.08= .05 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 20:08:06 -0700 (PDT) From: James F Weiher Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:08:05 -0400 Subject: can not email you To: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) I have tried responding in 10 or so different ways, but each is refused by = your servers. How do I email you? Jim From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 23:02:50 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1147741wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:02:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.23.234 with SMTP id v70mr29627146yhv.51.1432090970450; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-yh0-x245.google.com (mail-yh0-x245.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4002:c01::245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f34si9041674yhq.29.2015.05.19.20.02.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 20:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-yh0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::245 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4002:c01::245; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-yh0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::245 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by yhdz67 with SMTP id z67so20578476yhd.0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:02:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nmND/llWBs39Zy9CyUYJDZqMUaZeGJHBC8b4gDUv5Eo=; b=MJi9v+wphtc+9kQyQoydtCAsqtYt4noFnJv1C/Xow7dv4eCHI0TVXzZgOMg+LEANWc LwiSZSTvb9vTW8GcwQ8CtE64HLniyQKEZIDhhwv6Hyz8ln4RH7QcGlcjPNh0Th3fLJK4 kKAGwV2H8/XMd3Tyl1n+qq7wHBd3Nfr1hGIRJSkTI4BuoWtjrGCzax8RqCz3Anvak+Vl 99wz1ZJXVhtgOlaewtTPhJs8+8xRlCQDDtx4GvBl/SNjEVTbD1sRV2VUNIVS0h4rY2N3 NIIlmfTLjRr0Ko7WXQpi43QKHnk3FnNl8hcYbHQRlY/ejhPNrhic2SUQ6CCdGQr9FYkc OoZg== X-Received: by 10.140.82.48 with SMTP id g45mr39561962qgd.41.1432090969895; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:02:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.140.82.48 with SMTP id g45mr32419967qgd.41; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:02:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a11c114468bf10e05167aa928@google.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 03:02:49 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx2.demon.co.uk. [91.221.169.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to; bh=3DihRB3pKxTaQupAmvmTPw1H7GDjKEssVtIChZsBciV2g=3D; b=3DZZWuALfkQZaoUl6YPcnQfsCHwzXHiSXa2uSGJdgfeCklla0NNsGlJCS+EX7Pvnw= gwT P9Q/TJHWCJHjia0ngYy9VoC8kSEwn7fZWKKn+ac38lBgTlCXDY4AC/kne/8GpvlH7Z= nP 3uU/eDFMnHb2kb1mTdDOmIeCJU6nAI6/7YPnNCZ4k010Iuq3fL/EtusoXurBY5keWZ= I9 2NIPeycMYRAzjh2bmnV/5XNNyaE20QwwC07O5U0bbp9ZxBPobSDQImdsAQ2mK/0Qmf= k4 hvTDEcYX1txW4wl4nbl27iaRW17s+aJ+VK6rm6B90Gg5e4EYwzb7Qx6AS7DAumiwYg= dl /JNw=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSCRI5nPqK8Ib+BD9PnFAW4GsFIuCKVNNild9znXvNnEo6F4y= Y//LhCLPX7rrDGHqrFLM0 X-Received: by 10.140.82.48 with SMTP id g45mr39559836qgd.41.1432090938296; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r198sm10324303qha.2.2015.05.19.20.= 02.16 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 20:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=3DApple-Mail-20-664686502 From: James F Weiher In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:02:16 -0400 Message-Id: <6C64FA85-70B3-49F6-9C8F-0DB4204E275F@udel.edu> References: To: Richard Nabavi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) I've tried to respond to your email many times but always rejected by your = input system. This time I will try with all previous correspondence cut ou= t and my response attached as a file. Jim From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 22:54:06 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1144996wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:54:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.170.97.9 with SMTP id o9mr33534395yka.84.1432090445677; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-yh0-x246.google.com (mail-yh0-x246.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4002:c01::246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7si9029097yha.35.2015.05.19.19.54.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-yh0-x246.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::246 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4002:c01::246; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-yh0-x246.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::246 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by yhdz67 with SMTP id z67so20435191yhd.0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w81VStWg/KBxS3SPY3K/+NQ3yDilA++R78YpfK/cYLc=; b=snlsnkXNtblcFCE8KFxrcKszRHz56ptZfTa2LyL+Pr5cTtg0vI9NcC2F5ycLF9LeuQ MmSgNvG+z2DBvSJyvoI9xhgyFnF9BI/w6Wk956YoDXvza48qlbImeicMMKIzjWzXrwzv jDzaMtRarHC4nMcumpNKgT/q5W6nWNObmsaiTvtEOeT8bCyRCmyGiBlhYbOZE2z/lQ2r qkBadF3X8bsPM6NQgfMkqcI69s3xS2v8AxuV+IBGXY1u4XFeKvxPgO0nImVr5pX05o1A wHshue8MQcKBtizKCnnroJuPJmgHCkNGLX4HS/QFNRnRKSavQCOtrpnTo1FrE9Zluc1M ymzA== X-Received: by 10.55.23.33 with SMTP id i33mr21724243qkh.70.1432090445117; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.55.23.33 with SMTP id i33mr18507257qkh.70; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a1147a2aa44765205167a8a30@google.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 02:54:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx1.demon.co.uk. [91.221.168.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to; bh=3DNLppas9UKaYgleDqYnMzWNmbG9MzLzYX8FJigKdYfgI=3D; b=3DjaQXlAb/y4/DYQ9ZJSr48B4dVX4nC4OpVmIZBd7Qh/W/VMh3mzsLTopXjdUZb8P= Wmy 8J8qmqoboUpQemgtT/s/TtCaCPxqbcHRhljA9vqbv1i3fmjqrgUSKwWBL4d8Yr70S3= H8 wn1XZFb5bM0t/MB/svPtI8R4R3+3bAmdwfDRqLCkgwmzwTaUEL+vWm7yeB+vjflXX9= Zt mZj3JiTNIWVFo5srLRNTqdD2i+DLhQAmIP7pfHkBAmDDKsZKHUE3JoaES8cbmnq5jJ= Nu rnzebDq76sjg4OhA11sFEdxyNDcPV2rWFniued5zKyuBYQWXVvIkp7Z4kAp6lz4HBs= 8W 6zvg=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkt+vCDmuVIYVGNL13Db4Y09DR74r1XcQJoz871JP59S8zf+Z+= fZEEj6oy9C4OfxgXhq7Mo X-Received: by 10.55.23.33 with SMTP id i33mr21721193qkh.70.1432090413558; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z21sm10370044qge.18.2015.05.19.19.= 53.31 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 19:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3DApple-Mail-18-664161511 From: James F Weiher In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 22:53:31 -0400 Message-Id: References: To: Richard Nabavi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) On May 19, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Richard Nabavi wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > Good to hear from you. I think I might have been one of those who talked= to you in 1989! >=20 > Yes, APLX will work on MacOS 10.10. However, we don't have any plans to = produce an iPad version, which would require a completely different front-e= nd for the user interface. >=20 > it would be great if you could give that APL course. Let us know if we ca= n be of any help. >=20 > Best regards > Richard Nabavi >=20 >=20 >> Will the latest version of APLX run under OSX10.10 (Yosemite)? Do you ha= ve a version of APLX that will run on an iPad iOS 8? >> If not do you have plans for these. >> I am considering giving a course in APL at the Osher Institute of Lifelo= ng Learning at the University of Delaware in the Macintosh or iOS departmen= ts. >> At the 1989 International Conference of the APL-SIG in NY I talked to th= e then 2 principals of Micro-APL and encouraged them to develop a version o= f APL68000 which included the nested array and other extensions that IBM ha= d in their APL2. After the conference I was gratified that one of them emai= led me reporting that immediately on returning home they wrote the first li= ne of code for it and later that APL II was available. >>=20 >> If no one remembers me, let me mention a few items about my involvement = and interest in APL. In the late 1960s and early 1970s we at the DuPont Exp= erimental Station (Central Research Department) in Wilmington, DE began us= ing DECs excellent implementation of APL on our PDP-10s. Our visit with Ke= n Iverson encouraged and strengthened our involvement with APL. When later = the PDP-10s were being replaced by our VAX farm I migrated our operation f= rom the APLSF to the VAX-APL. At that time we also had an increasing number= of researchers using Macs and we started using the MicroAPL APL68000. When= the level 2 product appeared several users upgraded. However, shortly ther= eafter I left DuPont and the traditional anti-APL computing forces began to= win out and APL was forced out of DuPont, ----- Message truncated ----- From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 22:46:58 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1142865wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:46:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.92.165 with SMTP id b34mr38975681qge.13.1432090017818; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:46:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-qk0-x248.google.com (mail-qk0-x248.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j19si15793284qgd.102.2015.05.19.19.46.57 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 19:46:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qk0-x248.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::248 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::248; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qk0-x248.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::248 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by qkgv12 with SMTP id v12so32634124qkg.2 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jHOe93PqrFsiZxL0kZ+U59PEhHrmfRYyRFNzx9Sx/pM=; b=Hofb2+YHlAR0CTYcJYDilBf62kFM8kNBOQDPBQdz42AepS2hzApCX2/IGpsoF+b0YH dO2fIG2QZhdqkQiyUkny0U5+zjV7e+D7tVJ07JCh2djmKCJuK5Wh5By8XF+7fwWU2kxx FmNzmR3jV0ljsJxaTxZaReXJ20IFm2HNtVuz9dqtQF9UjmhLgmCx6U3BFvMT18qOzSwX b/nvveMbDbr+7LvEOy/PgzKXs+0FLWkFJ7yEbriUNot4ZBl0EyOGVKyyAZmr5PfKSWj7 ubyoJYwlAZw7p8u4YWdyNEdN5LVpRmqEhaJBXHEfiw2vPlADE6ms+uITXdVld2P3Xb7Q Dtwg== X-Received: by 10.55.20.159 with SMTP id 31mr66042773qku.64.1432090017428; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:46:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.55.20.159 with SMTP id 31mr54215691qku.64; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:46:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a113b0bfec6757705167a7023@google.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 02:46:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx1.demon.co.uk. [91.221.168.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to; bh=3D9oJyEY22PrBXa9YyjPQu7Eudw7XaPPyVj5seN3xUwZA=3D; b=3DiLSOKudLq+C6Txv0xGXFamwS7+oaWD+8ztqvpx+4WE0fh3HnS+WltER/u0Z6Xg+= 6l9 aXyDNjgO6yp9vDJpfkR524P0kaK5N8ANcs2HYEzrM0OiCJyMcH51vYAbtAkVYFw8Gt= MA Vccbb6MvmelNEz1siXJ1B6eKC9iNg37sDGZsOmAzNdZM4MCppzCJP5T1zlLw8VwH4m= or wQVsXSTq2AjjOVb7Fo7i7jd8V83md738CLC5+04GOwU4pFcoAvWeWL1xck9gApw52P= NA /vvgrfSb2hGqgtPN6yjO+zJQMLtRbbRJxNwzwjS4lMRA+3aY10T9JcFtseHhmf+DiY= fv oZ8A=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm8cR+2x69TNMEwltPuHa7NicddYU6uO6CcOialQmGr7H/D+jA= ph8pbY1X3uLCaeP2Hieio X-Received: by 10.55.20.159 with SMTP id 31mr66039487qku.64.1432089985381; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d36sm10411532qkh.45.2015.05.19.19.= 46.23 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 19:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3DApple-Mail-16-663732541 From: James F Weiher In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 22:46:22 -0400 Message-Id: References: To: Richard Nabavi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) can not get through to you. Will try a 6th time with the error attached. On May 19, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Richard Nabavi wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > Good to hear from you. I think I might have been one of those who talked= to you in 1989! >=20 > Yes, APLX will work on MacOS 10.10. However, we don't have any plans to = produce an iPad version, which would require a completely different front-e= nd for the user interface. >=20 > it would be great if you could give that APL course. Let us know if we ca= n be of any help. >=20 > Best regards > Richard Nabavi >=20 >=20 >> Will the latest version of APLX run under OSX10.10 (Yosemite)? Do you ha= ve a version of APLX that will run on an iPad iOS 8? >> If not do you have plans for these. >> I am considering giving a course in APL at the Osher Institute of Lifelo= ng Learning at the University of Delaware in the Macintosh or iOS departmen= ts. >> At the 1989 International Conference of the APL-SIG in NY I talked to th= e then 2 principals of Micro-APL and encouraged them to develop a version o= f APL68000 which included the nested array and other extensions that IBM ha= d in their APL2. After the conference I was gratified that one of them emai= led me reporting that immediately on returning home they wrote the first li= ne of code for it and later that APL II was available. >>=20 >> If no one remembers me, let me mention a few items about my involvement = and interest in APL. In the late 1960s and early 1970s we at the DuPont Exp= erimental Station (Central Research Department) in Wilmington, DE began us= ing DECs excellent implementation of APL on our PDP-10s. Our visit with Ke= n Iverson encouraged and strengthened our involvement with APL. When later = the PDP-10s were being replaced by our VAX farm I migrated our operation f= rom the APLSF to the VAX-APL. At that time we also had an increasing number= of researchers using Macs and we started using the MicroAPL APL68000. When= the level 2 product appeared several users upgraded. However, shortly ther= eafter I left DuPont and the traditional ----- Message truncated ----- From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 19:39:07 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1075810wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:39:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.24.209 with SMTP id 78mr41346967qky.19.1432078747074; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-qc0-x245.google.com (mail-qc0-x245.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 79si231734qgo.20.2015.05.19.16.39.06 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qc0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::245 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::245; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qc0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::245 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by qcbgj7 with SMTP id gj7so28425776qcb.3 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:39:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SeUbBwSa4HPo6ZqzfAbKY4xfxe2A5C/+tSkQw2KEe3I=; b=WGlZuIArxNEfEIX6NHO7NVjhwM3X9fQAAreTLguSxZFz0Nx5dxcxVDMFuvuv7Ukdbz YWiK2J8AN4HSHxTaPJo/830gKNyy9trWB6Ho34q9dbJRubDjejJV49tGheFpSVKNpk1O zB4dbxzJ0gctK/hFZyYl5CSnhB9y4IHCwsp6bDLGlBRMBI8yK1O1oodBUsFm2wba2UBA fVMBXCjbBbteYPnQQCdm2hCx7BRpN1pHU+NgrPi1LiuBRuBSasD3ME5JGcXUaTcGyUW7 q69BJtFObGK7Ms2Xc4Leye5NvyTltwTYYoaSD/m6ZqjQaqM5FVq2vpgsP2bYaa7TBmlb 7bbA== X-Received: by 10.55.20.132 with SMTP id 4mr10783849qku.104.1432078746682; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:39:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.55.20.132 with SMTP id 4mr9207766qku.104; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:39:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a113ffee2fc84b0051677d0fb@google.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:39:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx2.demon.co.uk. [91.221.169.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to; bh=3DpbMr0HCoTCfcGb6OHbAy67M19N7LeLian+bFMzbTM64=3D; b=3DX+lKNivNFzlbXu4RwLKjjCn2Yrz/WC3ZD0X0inDf/XPpeL/22F87xwatwlqfZ9y= DMp k15LhdeS8xDVM24XjpBT4FcSpNOX2iSAi/yQ/6pmZVNl8VP+K1ZxMAMMxVVT3XiMGU= jF hR3moKbRTAStczuBTiudFr+Z8wGcvzKfYm/ijD4LWKxpjyuqJMsJTwst693TSD5Nuz= 3Z 0WOW4q2YmPioo8G2+aPoCYgJ9G1GinrtdN5+JFs9EGB1Lw5B5KsZVDpwbbc4MlE6Hj= 0T b38cEwycu3jcJl4UjugxnTjnfYRoO21Y9Be8qz8xg5G0xryMxZD1yimlaKzLPwgImN= Mz Sb7g=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnEseTDUNiT30U7ikf/ms32dS5NeXDng6PvIAv0tIXpnSSxCcu= xHGXj12El3kYjAUboyVjE X-Received: by 10.55.20.132 with SMTP id 4mr10780418qku.104.1432078715325; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j66sm10077589qgj.8.2015.05.19.16.3= 8.33 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3DApple-Mail-13-652463255 From: James F Weiher In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:38:32 -0400 Message-Id: References: To: Richard Nabavi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) I have tried 5 times to answer you but each time my mail was rejected. Can = not determine what in the email was the problem. Suggestions? Jim Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx1.demon.co.uk. [91.221.168.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:from:content-type:date:subject:to:message-id :mime-version; bh=3Db7bOvdFgYTx3EcVPH0zr8wiFr8p47s7oBrnRclX2bZ4=3D; b=3DDIDm/5etvrZhcF84798i9UJFzQaGEUajQw/aOJt0aRTH/Tg9HmRkN7sm+sOvDUxV= /R kwjKF4OYGBLmeKhyHg/ZS7pG+miVbhQESILxp1zFiJHmJsNZAn3ffK2fHZmdtQA6Vi8= 9 zeFlQqCU3yNXibXtb1wIsDqHIfwXWbWIlwQsf6CZiix64gOKvJxtKInRvqBasgKwVtn= 2 2V4M2fYRCZmSOS4QkZQpzyXFqP0gLrZUbKFQmWPH6jrD8hP1csr9qkHG/CwoOKABn84= U NLUKZWPYrpmV4yuuXN80nJzVnurtebcqD2C0b+5HfD6XBmchfYIaXpYbHpLs+Nvo+Fr= l lAYQ=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/iwo8D64zvGoI2U0A5MUXx2ocYMOOzmPHt3naU0sAMO4s5yW= 2mIqjO2OixFoE1PFEnAEg X-Received: by 10.140.129.65 with SMTP id 62mr41077357qhb.102.1432078202581= ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) ----- Message truncated ----- From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 19:30:36 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1071913wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.227.42 with SMTP id rx10mr21661458vdc.14.1432078235158; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-vn0-x247.google.com (mail-vn0-x247.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oo12si1416993vdb.27.2015.05.19.16.30.34 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-vn0-x247.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::247 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::247; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-vn0-x247.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::247 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by vnbg129 with SMTP id g129so15866543vnb.1 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=njRlrh3Tq5pXHQ1zbmv9lJ1HU2s3lBi2RMEwQfdwYUs=; b=L4BT+BkMW8n/dcJJ0LE21ajnJw6DFkI5osvoEt2dBLD4+Nf65fbM+PILF0xMciLXht XVJrH+x109irIgw1ElTc3VyRh54THdNGlqbNn1W1D0OnuRZ+H8YYuTGfav/uvGUnAmsz r1qCyfPmQ5JNZfpRfnAO0ewVSj9oTQOhMqSglmvoAfDgX7YSvpqEf9/7nBYi4zoVRxC9 EDctYGBaePr06+OsJCPssmIty4ix88V9aOI35Nv6NSMyBoCOoPGsXDM8+zsS+us/cxwI x4poen6JzoO6YuHzeKXRyeuGEfyTKZiCw9nuByeZcE5Sy/6Dj52jXAVOx0CQTfp4VY/3 SGvw== X-Received: by 10.140.129.65 with SMTP id 62mr41079804qhb.102.1432078234591; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.140.129.65 with SMTP id 62mr33821190qhb.102; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: microapl@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a113525f2769eef051677b272@google.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:30:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: microapl@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx2.demon.co.uk. [91.221.169.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:from:content-type:date:subject:to:message-id :mime-version; bh=3Db7bOvdFgYTx3EcVPH0zr8wiFr8p47s7oBrnRclX2bZ4=3D; b=3DTpPRpIw3iZF5ZzLtBfxpTMOQaboV0P0ibjQetyG3i18bzPfxluRVPqgTUTyNdrq= gDx cntrOmPCMrQByRe8wSzWTi3prgMr0JGy9L6b1UcO8LL3o2s3tauexcqRezSetyOJ2T= Rl BNuxYE+MTCCMFQE6Fhae/SGJIe2kj7ePHKYhJYbjepObK7poEpB0i8XSlr8k65znhU= w8 NDkbWLs4dfweMFpzJlVUyqiiTq33OOojOEwpp88WRa5VSkFy4zFCrNixCwB0OQp83R= 1/ 2EUMfwlCKgWovJGToJdrlvGx5S4vAJEE1hc38kGniBWR4p/9gF8eNJ6D2XhbfJ0GLi= Qg 0qOg=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlxodLgnO0vLpbdXIkN7sLvW4lpr0w1BLhxfdFvRQlLjJTIL35= dXd0pjjZl5hyfz0KPSGgE X-Received: by 10.140.129.65 with SMTP id 62mr41077357qhb.102.1432078202581= ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 69sm9988973qhv.17.2015.05.19.16.30= .00 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:01 -0700 (PDT) From: James F Weiher Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3DApple-Mail-12-651950617 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:30:00 -0400 Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? To: Richard Nabavi , microapl@microapl.co.uk Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Hi Richard, Many thanks. Seeing your name reminds me. Good to see that you are still a = part of MicroAPL. By The Way who was your colleague that attended the 89 Co= nference with you. I talked to you both about adding APL2 features to your = APL68000 product and was gratified that you did so very quickly. I can see = that since those early days your firm (MicroAPL) has expanded and grown eno= rmously. Congratulations. I hope you can provide me with a full regular copy of the current APLX whic= h will run under OS 10.10 rather than the demo you provide for a month for = testing. I am serious about carefully exploring it over the coming months w= ith the hope to provide a course on APL using it. I understand that if I d= o give such a course a number of copies will then have to be purchased. The= course would probably be given not before 2016, but well in advance of tha= t I would be working with it, making the decision and planning the course f= rom ground up. Very sorry you have no plans for an APL product for the iPad. Could very us= eful. MicroAPL has always been at the forefront of APL from the days of 680= 0 on. So please keep an open mind on the subject. It could be an entry poin= t for future customers of the main-frame products. I do think APL has a fut= ure if we can find the right marketing paradigm and advocates. Not as a rep= lacement for C, but as a very high level environment both for users and pro= grammers. APL is elegant, mathematical and fun. C and other languages tend = not to be. In My Opinion Jim=20 PS: my answer to you kept being rejected by your filter 550 Rejected by con= tent scanner (CMAE). Now expanded two abbreviations that may be the cause. Jim On May 19, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Richard Nabavi wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > Good to hear from you. I think I might have been one of those who talked= to you in 1989! >=20 > Yes, APLX will work on MacOS 10.10. However, we don't have any plans to = produce an iPad version, which would require a completely different front-e= nd for the user interface. >=20 ----- Message truncated ----- From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 19:30:35 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1071906wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.233.166 with SMTP id tx6mr6674450vdc.91.1432078235098; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-vn0-x245.google.com (mail-vn0-x245.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id aa10si1198916vdd.107.2015.05.19.16.30.34 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-vn0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::245 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::245; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-vn0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::245 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by vnbf129 with SMTP id f129so15872083vnb.0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f/mizl+G5RJ1S4WxIIVMhksqiZLnvdu7RTwGiKfcwyg=; b=IX8TTbNl6AdqVWAWXwugkzVgYabI8Uk1hlxK9ocj7sUTWVFhVFS0HaAzztxyQv37Fh cd0kT8StwDzpNRiZ2lwJFWMC5fJ9NrQAkrA7cEuM68HNHs+yQdkV3atLlEAInfSMTuFD pB7S5Mw94trat+tsCErIxD98IZ2/kvXF6rquCdaHWIF23KZMVD5WPPmR6HW17o+M2Qws WnzRHxtpzyzc25Tim1Qc0R/QxRpQbPjnMBCvSWTx6AZgXr2HEztuzssrMNlZwXMIy183 MIuPD6HBnbev5pehVw7O70wIpu1ThaabGyNWkbRqMR5S4PklToLVlbiIDywnqCgNn6TO 9wkQ== X-Received: by 10.140.129.65 with SMTP id 62mr41079807qhb.102.1432078234649; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.140.129.65 with SMTP id 62mr33821192qhb.102; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a113525f277839f051677b297@google.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:30:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx1.demon.co.uk. [91.221.168.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:from:content-type:date:subject:to:message-id :mime-version; bh=3Db7bOvdFgYTx3EcVPH0zr8wiFr8p47s7oBrnRclX2bZ4=3D; b=3DDIDm/5etvrZhcF84798i9UJFzQaGEUajQw/aOJt0aRTH/Tg9HmRkN7sm+sOvDUx= V/R kwjKF4OYGBLmeKhyHg/ZS7pG+miVbhQESILxp1zFiJHmJsNZAn3ffK2fHZmdtQA6Vi= 89 zeFlQqCU3yNXibXtb1wIsDqHIfwXWbWIlwQsf6CZiix64gOKvJxtKInRvqBasgKwVt= n2 2V4M2fYRCZmSOS4QkZQpzyXFqP0gLrZUbKFQmWPH6jrD8hP1csr9qkHG/CwoOKABn8= 4U NLUKZWPYrpmV4yuuXN80nJzVnurtebcqD2C0b+5HfD6XBmchfYIaXpYbHpLs+Nvo+F= rl lAYQ=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/iwo8D64zvGoI2U0A5MUXx2ocYMOOzmPHt3naU0sAMO4s5yW= 2mIqjO2OixFoE1PFEnAEg X-Received: by 10.140.129.65 with SMTP id 62mr41077357qhb.102.1432078202581= ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 69sm9988973qhv.17.2015.05.19.16.30= .00 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:30:01 -0700 (PDT) From: James F Weiher Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3DApple-Mail-12-651950617 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:30:00 -0400 Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? To: Richard Nabavi , microapl@microapl.co.uk Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Hi Richard, Many thanks. Seeing your name reminds me. Good to see that you are still a = part of MicroAPL. By The Way who was your colleague that attended the 89 Co= nference with you. I talked to you both about adding APL2 features to your = APL68000 product and was gratified that you did so very quickly. I can see = that since those early days your firm (MicroAPL) has expanded and grown eno= rmously. Congratulations. I hope you can provide me with a full regular copy of the current APLX whic= h will run under OS 10.10 rather than the demo you provide for a month for = testing. I am serious about carefully exploring it over the coming months w= ith the hope to provide a course on APL using it. I understand that if I d= o give such a course a number of copies will then have to be purchased. The= course would probably be given not before 2016, but well in advance of tha= t I would be working with it, making the decision and planning the course f= rom ground up. Very sorry you have no plans for an APL product for the iPad. Could very us= eful. MicroAPL has always been at the forefront of APL from the days of 680= 0 on. So please keep an open mind on the subject. It could be an entry poin= t for future customers of the main-frame products. I do think APL has a fut= ure if we can find the right marketing paradigm and advocates. Not as a rep= lacement for C, but as a very high level environment both for users and pro= grammers. APL is elegant, mathematical and fun. C and other languages tend = not to be. In My Opinion Jim=20 PS: my answer to you kept being rejected by your filter 550 Rejected by con= tent scanner (CMAE). Now expanded two abbreviations that may be the cause. Jim On May 19, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Richard Nabavi wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > Good to hear from you. I think I might have been one of those who talked= to you in 1989! >=20 > Yes, APLX will work on MacOS 10.10. However, we don't have any plans to = produce an iPad version, which would require a completely different front-e= nd for the user interface. >=20 ----- Message truncated ----- From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 19:10:18 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1064394wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.40.92 with SMTP id o89mr49326724qkh.74.1432077016954; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-qk0-x245.google.com (mail-qk0-x245.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z98si294617qkg.103.2015.05.19.16.10.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qk0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::245 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::245; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qk0-x245.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::245 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by qkac3 with SMTP id c3so28863573qka.0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WxeA7dlC0YHQrlW4vBzhZPYaOPk1arQo740/QGMW6o0=; b=mliVI6W46Miuvbb3O3gU8XaTV4XU+QwfDYc9vtcQJR1irQH3cf1foqajcrR68/Ko40 OqNvucJR0/nei0+lC+eEQbb42EshJdP2fw/PSWdLIv2pF4DsSelaof3bInoc93kwSmXv FT9jLkT8A/3lDqMAQExABPCN/DKIZJKlpDQ4OjtcDftqg3V1+T9XgZihA3IJ8eQHEYOu vvQdQ3HdlUmQB/hYa9fG2LTFnuppbtYehta3mLKWTeHnxvZv3Z+pBnA69HwHVXlJDe7Y BTw/mwbDHevI7Cce9vVpsap7yymin8qCEf1GBAjyKcIP2qTpe5ewvhGhWqNffPB5W59j O3Iw== X-Received: by 10.140.147.81 with SMTP id 78mr40871598qht.97.1432077016419; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.140.147.81 with SMTP id 78mr33654255qht.97; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: microapl@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a1135609edacdaa0516776965@google.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:10:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: microapl@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx1.demon.co.uk. [91.221.168.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to; bh=3D+Ezb1dLJ5SNAupINjPp5KwyYme3Xr3KWNcxhau73tkw=3D; b=3DCIxNdxjBUTS6ktY5vYZuen+OJrMnlUAFQTsy+H8ZbUVp/0zc+abGWLqet8gUGkx= IwF ++tmtjY34/ri6I4ucbjAD+y2leQ5A6hARwlC5reOoSUpZFgETtgNk5F3wB/9Akz9w4= s6 4t9TLFL+I34Za5r/6lSz7Dh6pToXtFV491u62H8yPu+nxH4CcBXeyT1JYrVW61Tjrq= on YRFNQZuc4Yx8nLEHQxi0Dy9CcDzUXdTTMn21zbV3SBpRL4pSmoSOs6QTIQWbATQb4s= Yd GsViRjKOISbKA51DlmbrxnMRUbiCxM/mo7f25KpSegxFxLDsghllA022odlvwCm8hR= Ek hMvA=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk4Bk8lYk2QrZA7DoU84rLJhcRTA65nEF1hmxYy69/ZHJu9QUx= wG/wTj3z0OmVFE01GNVav X-Received: by 10.140.147.81 with SMTP id 78mr40869138qht.97.1432076984687; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r198sm9968921qha.2.2015.05.19.16.0= 9.42 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3DApple-Mail-9-650731886 From: James F Weiher In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:09:41 -0400 Message-Id: <6DD4878F-D2EF-40B4-9F6D-FBE6137C5154@udel.edu> References: To: Richard Nabavi , microapl@microapl.co.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Hi Richard, Many thanks. Seeing your name reminds me. Good to see that you are still a = part of MicroAPL. BTW who was your colleague that attended the 89 Conferenc= e with you. I talked to you both about adding APL2 features to your APL6800= 0 product and was gratified that you did so very quickly. I can see that si= nce those early days your "baby" (MicroAPL) has expanded and grown enormous= ly. Congratulations. I hope you can provide me with a full regular copy of the current APLX whic= h will run under OS 10.10 rather than the demo you provide for a month for = testing. I am serious about carefully exploring it over the coming months w= ith the hope to provide a course on APL using it. I understand that if I d= o give such a course a number of copies will then have to be purchased. The= course would probably be given not before 2016, but well in advance of tha= t I would be working with it, making the decision and planning the course f= rom ground up. Very sorry you have no plans for an APL product for the iPad. Could very us= eful. MicroAPL has always been at the forefront of APL from the days of 680= 0 on. So please keep an open mind on the subject. It could be an entry poin= t for future customers of the main-frame products. I do think APL has a fut= ure if we can find the right marketing paradigm and advocates. Not as a rep= lacement for C, but as a very high level environment both for users and pro= grammers. APL is elegant, mathematical and fun. C and other languages tend = not to be. IMO Jim=20 On May 19, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Richard Nabavi wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > Good to hear from you. I think I might have been one of those who talked= to you in 1989! >=20 > Yes, APLX will work on MacOS 10.10. However, we don't have any plans to = produce an iPad version, which would require a completely different front-e= nd for the user interface. >=20 > it would be great if you could give that APL course. Let us know if we ca= n be of any help. >=20 > Best regards > Richard Nabavi >=20 >=20 >> Will the latest version of APLX run under OSX10. ----- Message truncated ----- From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 19:10:17 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp1064386wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.50.198 with SMTP id y189mr64747642qky.52.1432077016750; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-qk0-x247.google.com (mail-qk0-x247.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d129si757606qka.37.2015.05.19.16.10.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qk0-x247.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::247 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::247; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qk0-x247.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::247 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by qkzz198 with SMTP id z198so28858282qkz.1 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qeWbVu63u2ltql8v4Eb0J8conBS7VVk9/LvXi1vPOIE=; b=ptz72WkMuaYtZJ//0CZMVGl3a6zC4ofmqIxrq+X5WOSEUcGgbq27jwp6/fxf/SQX7r yjX+SX4tzplPbK7JBCzjS+sgfaUYd4oo134wGHcQq2g8hvXMljrk9YXVsCX6Q1ig0VzL FrK+yADjPio3/fBxqpbGdZL9MSgIlcLuVkh/hMQYfZCtiwRhxiL5wV7bxkuxQekv5hnc aB16RcOuL/x2cG6w7+JaU0+7ixOrzFzOANIV1vYT0yarEYpdQ0Pqap+v+nYTbHN185sG bSHuc8T/C2qOigBEnG3lF1/EtF4xT85JnYjeGRW8gG4yDVuwgL8dN8NGNShe/1QBVcZN jSKw== X-Received: by 10.140.147.81 with SMTP id 78mr40871592qht.97.1432077016359; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.140.147.81 with SMTP id 78mr33654258qht.97; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a1135609ed9e1060516776933@google.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:10:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx1.demon.co.uk. [91.221.168.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to; bh=3D+Ezb1dLJ5SNAupINjPp5KwyYme3Xr3KWNcxhau73tkw=3D; b=3DR5rCqfHUQxaQhvQ44f9dh2CL2oYdfyJZDT17tKQfHNT+ccdJ4rvIzk12OiiTiwI= UxP y7Y6u+NxObD4y6WjwpK9TZoTz2hIM9/EQQHy3XWd/LF/bEFgDRWexRcrkyxjgYFqZp= 3G tnpycousiicC/8VuoeOmSrYBILQhslYK36NQC29A53iFSBVJwqBRp9tiw4E8p+hFSd= ZC 0OA4HhkyURPKbh3WoHJO5qgphA5ETlJQoZUpB3G9X8r2/kUYI4ABODHEDvSfqgMxMB= lx UzEe38nDQp1s2UaNMMwieVnpneNDVxfYJEckLN6oYs7LoxecZGI+TFIgwngJCzhLNL= 2c XL/A=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/wRWnN0vcI/f6RYO3eLZfmBmyCmF4MTz+mjepjz2QyrMK4lO= dn9PtC6rFLIEiSRi6qfwh X-Received: by 10.140.147.81 with SMTP id 78mr40869138qht.97.1432076984687; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r198sm9968921qha.2.2015.05.19.16.0= 9.42 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3DApple-Mail-9-650731886 From: James F Weiher In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:09:41 -0400 Message-Id: <6DD4878F-D2EF-40B4-9F6D-FBE6137C5154@udel.edu> References: To: Richard Nabavi , microapl@microapl.co.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Hi Richard, Many thanks. Seeing your name reminds me. Good to see that you are still a = part of MicroAPL. BTW who was your colleague that attended the 89 Conferenc= e with you. I talked to you both about adding APL2 features to your APL6800= 0 product and was gratified that you did so very quickly. I can see that si= nce those early days your "baby" (MicroAPL) has expanded and grown enormous= ly. Congratulations. I hope you can provide me with a full regular copy of the current APLX whic= h will run under OS 10.10 rather than the demo you provide for a month for = testing. I am serious about carefully exploring it over the coming months w= ith the hope to provide a course on APL using it. I understand that if I d= o give such a course a number of copies will then have to be purchased. The= course would probably be given not before 2016, but well in advance of tha= t I would be working with it, making the decision and planning the course f= rom ground up. Very sorry you have no plans for an APL product for the iPad. Could very us= eful. MicroAPL has always been at the forefront of APL from the days of 680= 0 on. So please keep an open mind on the subject. It could be an entry poin= t for future customers of the main-frame products. I do think APL has a fut= ure if we can find the right marketing paradigm and advocates. Not as a rep= lacement for C, but as a very high level environment both for users and pro= grammers. APL is elegant, mathematical and fun. C and other languages tend = not to be. IMO Jim=20 On May 19, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Richard Nabavi wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > Good to hear from you. I think I might have been one of those who talked= to you in 1989! >=20 > Yes, APLX will work on MacOS 10.10. However, we don't have any plans to = produce an iPad version, which would require a completely different front-e= nd for the user interface. >=20 > it would be great if you could give that APL course. Let us know if we ca= n be of any help. >=20 > Best regards > Richard Nabavi >=20 >=20 >> Will the latest version of APLX run under OSX10. ----- Message truncated ----- From mailer-daemon@googlemail.com Tue May 19 16:25:12 2015 Delivered-To: weiher@udel.edu Received: by 10.28.65.65 with SMTP id o62csp998342wma; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:25:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.238.143 with SMTP id j137mr11708384qhc.52.1432067111845; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from mail-qg0-x247.google.com (mail-qg0-x247.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c198si1512187qka.100.2015.05.19.13.25.11 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 13:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qg0-x247.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::247 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::247; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mail-qg0-x247.google.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::247 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by qgde91 with SMTP id e91so10699193qgd.2 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:25:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uPSs0JE6ta+OmFSHrcu+ob2SNvQgVJkbeCdCiweJRE8=; b=vke/AtpPIVI6jdv1vjfOwuvkdIR5PVknx+Muf4Ku931XDMzTF1tM85AcAvhCV9H8Wp sJnSWKyK4cem8yx/Ku98UQ0munkjzLODgecGOObtkRIyJaIO3lsihj8pBGzoXmwQWc52 C01VsYh2XKJg+9z1a6DArWOTXU4V4xq6Hg7bpK4scxX024CwMkyOTMkzTXF1ODD5+4+W ssBvWi1GiUhKHpul2R5NtwNH+Kaicm8GPzDakEhLT9H2ajK3qb7UDk0zIz22p335Enk1 qzbtlL63tW7TxpnzmydJFq5bawlwbp4QNjvnhDTkwRw6zdZ/Y35fDkatJezlr+jyKJR9 5WqQ== X-Received: by 10.55.18.104 with SMTP id c101mr56290242qkh.25.1432067111457; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:25:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: <> Received: by 10.55.18.104 with SMTP id c101mr46968000qkh.25; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:25:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: weiher@udel.edu X-Failed-Recipients: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Message-ID: <001a11475a7e79112b0516751bb2@google.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:25:11 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: RichardNabavi@microapl.co.uk Technical details of permanent failure:=20 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for= the recipient domain microapl.co.uk by mx2.demon.co.uk. [91.221.169.150]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Rejected by content scanner (CMAE). See http://mailreport.co.uk/FAQ/CMA= E_PreFilter for an explanation. Fingerprint is ----- Original message ----- X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/relaxed; d=3D1e100.net; s=3D20130820; h=3Dx-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to; bh=3DYy2tW8tM3P43RwmjzeX2oXsJBoPgJQfeVgfqcjKN2m8=3D; b=3DDwo9qZqibkC8gIIH/iuBbHh8CNSLdFEMt33m49CZczE3esIAxWZzDy7HxcdDViR= TZo AnmKRWQtI3CHor0O+B3U3IqhsrIWRxJDOsw/Zi7GrK1tUzbOmgMCqOevAhNn2Mo5/8= ba TxApt2PPlcndpxUCmebbjsGJcnylpxr2+O6GuTlZ6Dk3wariujwy7Y/7krFm57P55L= J5 ASqYotwPi8VwbmibxAab47u4d9K7Srfue1vtVT6TovAJ0qKJOzjtP7KytSYOjNG6Zf= VR 0m/vJTdZ7Hr4veJqhkXbMpg6vLTncnpy6xLd+9eaf+PA2SsypLY0bgRWOWy0T5+A3N= R+ T+4A=3D=3D X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlk9fWqL6FOAISVq4OGiJmeLNX13B2gpSDBMigw1JB6uSB3lYO= 85/b0QYkUc93NS7DIxhLp X-Received: by 10.55.18.104 with SMTP id c101mr56285907qkh.25.1432067079859= ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from weiher-imac.home (pool-173-62-214-77.phlapa.fios.verizon.net= . [173.62.214.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k23sm9689443qhc.18.2015.05.19.13.2= 4.37 (version=3DTLSv1 cipher=3DRC4-SHA bits=3D128/128); Tue, 19 May 2015 13:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: aplx v5.1.0 on Apple Platforms? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=3DApple-Mail-8-640826904 From: James F Weiher In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:24:36 -0400 Message-Id: References: To: Richard Nabavi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Hi Richard, Many thanks. Seeing your name reminds me. Good to see that you are still a = part of MicroAPL. BTW who was your colleague that attended the 89 Conferenc= e with you. I talked to you both about adding APL2 features to your APL6800= 0 product and was gratified that you did so very quickly. I can see that si= nce those early days your "baby" (MicroAPL) has expanded and grown enormous= ly. Congratulations. I hope you can provide me with a full regular copy of the current APLX whic= h will run under OS 10.10 rather than the demo you provide for a month for = testing. I am serious about carefully exploring it over the coming months w= ith the hope to provide a course on APL using it. I understand that if I d= o give such a course a number of copies will then have to be purchased. The= course would probably be given not before 2016, but well in advance of tha= t I would be working with it, making the decision and planning the course f= rom ground up. Very sorry you have no plans for an APL product for the iPad. Could very us= eful. MicroAPL has always been at the forefront of APL from the days of 680= 0 on. So please keep an open mind on the subject. It could be an entry poin= t for future customers of the main-frame products. I do think APL has a fut= ure if we can find the right marketing paradigm and advocates. Not as a rep= lacement for C, but as a very high level environment both for users and pro= grammers. APL is elegant, mathematical and fun. C and other languages tend = not to be. IMO Jim=20 On May 19, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Richard Nabavi wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > Good to hear from you. I think I might have been one of those who talked= to you in 1989! >=20 > Yes, APLX will work on MacOS 10.10. However, we don't have any plans to = produce an iPad version, which would require a completely different front-e= nd for the user interface. >=20 > it would be great if you could give that APL course. Let us know if we ca= n be of any help. >=20 > Best regards > Richard Nabavi >=20 >=20 >> Will the latest version of APLX run under OSX10. ----- Message truncated -----